Skip to content
Platform Engineering
Capabilities include platform engineering, web, mobile, cloud, DevOps, machine learning, big data, generative AI, data warehousing, predictive analytics, infrastructure, and cybersecurity.
LLM · knowledge · UX

Applied generative AI

Generative AI Solutions

Secure generative AI features for content, knowledge access, coding assistance, and product UX.

Generative AI can accelerate knowledge work and product experiences, but demos that ignore security, grounding, and evaluation rarely survive contact with enterprise reality. Successful solutions treat LLMs as components inside a larger system: retrieval, tools, permissions, and UX.

Technisal builds generative features with secure RAG (retrieval-augmented generation), clear data residency and access controls, and evaluation that goes beyond “looks good in a chat.” We favor grounded answers over free-form invention when users need truth from your documents and systems.

Whether you need an internal knowledge assistant, customer-facing copilots, content workflows, or developer productivity tools, we design for auditability, cost control, and the failure modes that matter in your domain.

How Technisal delivers

How we ship genAI that stays trustworthy

We ground models in your knowledge, constrain tools and outputs, and evaluate quality continuously, so generative features remain useful after the pilot.

01

Secure RAG and knowledge assistants

Document ingestion, chunking, embeddings, retrieval, and answer generation with permission-aware filters so users only see content they are allowed to access.

02

Product UX for copilots and agents

In-app assistance, drafting, and guided workflows with clear affordances for sources, edits, and undo, so users stay in control of the final outcome.

03

Tool use and system integration

Controlled function calling into APIs and databases for actions that go beyond chat, always with authentication, rate limits, and human confirmation where needed.

04

Evaluation and red-teaming

Offline test sets, online feedback, and targeted checks for hallucination, toxicity, and policy violations before and after release.

05

Cost, latency, and model strategy

Routing between model sizes and providers, caching, and prompt design that balance quality with spend and response time.

Our approach

A practical path from shared understanding to durable outcomes in generative ai solutions.

  1. 1

    Frame the use case and risk

    Define users, success criteria, data classes, and what the system must never do. Choose build vs. configure vs. buy components accordingly.

  2. 2

    Design grounding and guardrails

    Architect retrieval, prompt structure, tool permissions, logging, and content filters. Decide where humans must approve outputs.

  3. 3

    Prototype with evaluation harness

    Ship a thin vertical slice against a representative corpus and golden questions; measure faithfulness and usefulness before expanding.

  4. 4

    Harden and operate

    Add monitoring for cost, latency, and quality regressions; document runbooks; plan corpus refresh and model upgrades.

Outcomes we aim for

  • Faster access to institutional knowledge

    Teams find and synthesize information from approved sources without hunting through disconnected drives and tickets.

  • Product experiences that feel intelligent

    Copilots and generative UX reduce friction in creation and support flows while showing sources and limits.

  • Production-grade safety posture

    Access control, logging, and evaluation reduce the risk of leakage and confident-but-wrong answers.

What you receive

  • Use-case and risk assessment with success metrics
  • Architecture for RAG / agents / model access
  • Ingestion pipeline and permission-aware retrieval
  • Application UX or API integration for the feature
  • Evaluation set, baseline scores, and monitoring plan
  • Operations guide: costs, incidents, and content refresh

What careful delivery considers

Domain realities that shape architecture, compliance, and product choices, addressed explicitly in our work.

Ungrounded generation is a liability for enterprise Q&A

Industry evaluations of LLM assistants show that retrieval grounding and citation patterns reduce hallucinations for knowledge tasks. Free-form chat over private data without retrieval is rarely appropriate for factual answers.

Permissions must apply at retrieval time

Security practice for enterprise search and RAG requires that document ACLs and tenant boundaries filter what the model can see, not only what the UI displays after generation.

Evaluation is continuous, not a launch checkbox

Model and corpus changes shift behavior. Leading genAI product teams maintain regression suites and user feedback loops; one-time demo success is not a production quality bar.

Common questions

Do you fine-tune models or use hosted APIs?

Both are options. Many products succeed with strong RAG and prompting on hosted models. Fine-tuning or private deployment is considered when latency, cost at scale, or domain style justifies the operational load.

Can generative AI run only on our cloud and data?

Yes. We can design private VPC deployments, customer-managed keys, and no-training contractual setups with providers, aligned with your security and compliance requirements.

How do you reduce hallucinations?

Grounding in retrieved sources, refusal when evidence is weak, structured outputs, citation UI, and evaluation that penalizes unsupported claims. High-stakes domains keep human review for critical actions.

Ship generative AI that earns user trust

Describe the workflow or product surface you want to enhance. We will propose a secure RAG or genAI design with a realistic evaluation path.